I don't usually do this kind of writing but it seems deserved, what with the recent Republican platform's Personhood Amendment (which, to me, appears to have the power to ban abortion even when the
But given the way all this seems to have turned our public conversation on that Pesky Woman Question into ponderings about whether a raped woman can ever conceive and whether Rapists' Fatherhood Rights are also going to be on the Republican Platform, I think it's time to cast a sharp light on some other aspects of the fringes of that party. Though it does appear, these days, to consist mostly of weird fringe elements, rich old white men being one of those (though of course the one in power).
So here it goes: The weirder news about Republicans in this country.
First, in New Hampshire a Republican candidate for Hillsborough County Sheriff Frank Szabo promises to use lethal force against doctors who perform abortions. To uphold the Constitution, you know:
In the face of criticism from both New Hampshire Democrats and high-ranking members of his own party, Republican candidate for Hillsborough County Sheriff Frank Szabo is not backing off his comments that deadly force is an appropriate means to prevent abortion.
"Just because a law is on the books does not mean that it's lawful," said Szabo. "I talk about the difference of 'legal' and 'lawful.' It used to be legal to own slaves, but that didn't make it lawful. It used to be legal to restrict someone of color to the back of bus ... Just because a piece of legislation says it's legal to murder the unborn doesn't make it lawful."
Szabo contends it's the responsibility of the sheriff to protect the lives, property and citizens of the country and the state.
"The big issue here is the sheriff is supposed to protect all of its citizens," he said. "Just because a person is not born yet doesn't mean he or she shouldn't have same level of protection. Someone needs to stand up and tell federal and state officials they're wrong if it's in the best interest of citizens ... but my main point is deadly force is always a last resort."
Some Republican leaders, at least, have disowned Frank Zabo.
Second, in Lubbock County, Texas, a judge called Tom Head worries about how he is going to cope with the violent revolution which would inevitably result if Obama gets a second term:
Judge Tom Head and Commissioner Mark Heinrich told the station this week that a 1.7 cent tax increase for the next fiscal year was necessary to prepare for many contingencies, including Obama's re-election. He also mentioned to the station that the county needs a pay increase is needed for the district attorney's office and more funds to pay for more sheriff's office deputies.
"He's going to try to hand over the sovereignty of the United States to the (United Nations), and what is going to happen when that happens?," Head asked the station during a Monday interview. "I'm thinking the worst. Civil unrest, civil disobedience, civil war maybe. And we're not just talking a few riots here and demonstrations, we're talking Lexington, Concord, take up arms and get rid of the guy."
Third, and this is really below the belt, a masturbation story having to do with an anti-gay Republican pastor in New Orleans. This story matters, because the pastor, Grant Storms, disapproves of the consensual sexuality of gays and lesbians:
A prominent Louisiana-based Christian pastor known for his anti-gay stance was convicted of obscenity yesterday after being caught masturbating at a public park near a children's playground last year.
As NOLA.com reports, Rev. Grant Storm was sentenced to three years' probation after the incident in Lafreniere Park. Storm is quoted as calling public masturbation "a thrill" in his confession. However, despite an eyewitness account cited by the New Orleans Times-Picayune which stated that 55-year-old pastor had been "looking at the playground area that contained children playing, with his zipper down" at the time of his arrest, authorities denied any suspicions that he was a pedophile.
I could go on. These are low-hanging fruit, true, and I almost always leave them alone. But when the higher fruit consist of Akin and Ryan and their other brothers-of-heart there's not that much difference in what I pick.
Any point to this post? Perhaps to show you that I could do this. But mostly to point out that it's someone else who sets the topics for public debates in this country, and that someone else is far too often a Republican game lord. Thus we now discuss whether women who have been raped should have the right to an abortion if they so wish. We actually discuss which exceptions to the abortion bans are possible!