Brooks wrote about Bush commuting Libby's sentence. If you want to know what I think about it, go to the TAPPED blog.
And pretty surprisingly, Chris Matthews sees the decision as a bad one.
A June 21 post by Josh Marshall seems very relevant here, too. Thanks for Barry for linking to it:
The Supreme Court made it harder Thursday for most defendants to challenge their federal prison sentences.
Appeals courts that review prison terms imposed by trial judges may deem them reasonable if they fall within federal sentencing guidelines adopted in the mid-1980s, the high court said.
The justices upheld a 33-month sentence given to Victor Rita for perjury and making false statements. Rita is a 25-year military veteran and former civilian federal employee.
The prison term falls within the guidelines range and was upheld by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, posing the question of whether sentences within the guidelines ordinarily will be considered reasonable.